ISO Updates to Multi-pass Oil Filter Test ProceduresThe
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) standard for multi-pass
testing provides a common testing format for filter manufacturers to rate
liquid filter performance. This standardization gives you the ability
to reliably compare published filter (ß) beta ratios among different
brands of filters, rather than relying on micron ratings. ISO test standard
4572 was replaced in 1999 by ISO 16889, which reflects the improved technology
available in particle counters and other test equipment. The newer particle
counters provide more precise counting and greater detail -- reflecting
a truer indication of filter performance. ISO only issues test procedures
to standardize filter testing, which allows the results to be comparable.
ISO does not actually perform any commercial product testing, nor do they
specify filter performance requirements. Better
Test Dust: The old test dust (AC fine test dust or ACFTD) was
"ball milled," which produced dust particles of varying size
and shape. Particle distribution was often different from batch to batch.
The accuracy of ACFTD distribution and previous automatic particle counting
calibration procedures was questioned by the industry, due to lack of
traceability and certification. ACFTD has not been produced since 1992.
Now, the new test dust (ISO medium test dust) is "jet milled"
to produce consistent particle size, shape, and distribution from batch
to batch (see dust size comparison chart below). The old particle counter
calibration was based on only one dimension of an irregularly-shaped particle
(the longest cord). Today, the particle counter calibration is based on
equivalent spherical area of an irregularly-shaped particle. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) provides calibration suspension, which is certified with X number of particles at a certain size. This is verified by NIST. The new way to list (ß) beta ratios includes a subscript (c) to indicate NIST certified test suspension and assures you of traceability and repeatability. Overall, you can have strong confidence in liquid filter ratings resulting from tests per ISO 16889, as they are highly accurate. As always, keep in mind that beta ratings are laboratory measurements under steady flow conditions with artificial contaminants - the real proof of the performance is how clean the filter keeps the fluids in the application. The consistent use of a fluid analysis program that checks the cleanliness of the fluid will verify that proper filters are being used.
ISO
16889 recommends reporting beta ratings at:
For additional information, contact: Filter Manufacturers
Council Revised October 2004 Back to Top |